http://hashbreaker.com:8700/tmrldrtg/Featured by the BOINC framework, we have developed an advanced method to rapidly calculate even the biggest tables.
Linux und Windows Anwendung verfügbar.
Ramverbrauch 2,2 MB RAM, Zeit P4 3,2 HT 1,47h
http://hashbreaker.com:8700/tmrldrtg/Featured by the BOINC framework, we have developed an advanced method to rapidly calculate even the biggest tables.
Hello Everyone,
I hope to help clarify a few things about the Hashbreaker & TMRL DRTG project.
1) Hashbreaker.com & TMRL are not hacker organizations.
We specialize in helping individuals and companies maintain strong password policies by auditing password strength. This audit helps companies maintain Sarbanes Oxley controls over their core networks.
2) Hashbreaker.com does not profit from tables generated using the BOINC system.
All tables generated (And even two tables MD5 & SHA1 that where not generated) using the BOINC client are freely available for download on the Hashbreaker.com website. The current table (MD5 1-8 mixalpha numeric) will be roughly 500GB in size when completed. It too will be 100% free. We have been working on a system that will allow those participants who help in the project free access to the Hashbreaker Online cracker. It should be finished mid-January. Until then, the Hashbreaker Online functionality is NOT commercial and may be used by anyone who registers an account.
3) We do not help Hackers
In our Use Policy it clearly states that anyone using our resources will be prosecuted to the fullest extent under US law. We will cooperate fully with any Law Enforcement agency to the limits of our Privacy Policy.
4) We are profiting from all this
We only profit from one of two things. 1: Use of our CPU’s for Rainbowtable Cryptanalysis 2: Sale of Rainbowtables we created without the BOINC System. We offer the BOINC system as a way of enhancing our services, and spreading security awareness.
5) We do not audit members passwords
That’s correct; we do NOT in any way audit the passwords of our members. Hard as it may be to believe, it is a voluntary subscription. If you are a security professional, use a strong password, mine is a minimum 32 chars long, and never used anywhere twice.
We do not hide what we do, we are willing to answer any password auditing or security related question posed.
The site is new and still in Beta, we will look into the Javascript issues that might prevent some people from accessing our site.
Anyone wishing to remove an account is free to do so, Thank you for you interest in our site, we are a proud supporter of the BOINC project and support it fully. Its an inspiration to many people who find new and creative ways to use technology for the benefit of everyone.
I am sorry for anyone who may have thought otherwise. I would encourage everyone to learn what a project is about before resorting to vandalism and defacements.
Thanks - Spudster
or in the forumOur new site features an online cracking service and many more rainbowtables.
That sounds (at least for me) to be "an other world".Free Hashing
Have a Hash? Need an answer? Post it here for the community to crack.
Sorry Reb, das hört sich ja so an, als wäre es von Vorteil, im Bereich der "fixed credits" zu sein - würdest Du das bitte erläutern, danke, mfG WNjrebirther wrote:I have added this to the "fixed credits" thread ;)
Es geht hier nur um das neue Creditsystem, die Daten, die demnächst folgen werden, habe ich in dem Thread bei uns hier hinterlegt. Dient lediglich zur Information, falls jemand wissen will, wieviel man bei einem Projekt abgreifen kann (sollte mal einheitlich werden).WNj wrote:Sorry Reb, das hört sich ja so an, als wäre es von Vorteil, im Bereich der "fixed credits" zu sein - würdest Du das bitte erläutern, danke, mfG WNjrebirther wrote:I have added this to the "fixed credits" thread ;)
Eben - und fixed credits ist zwar einheitlich aber nun wirklich nicht fair, oder?rebirther wrote:Es geht hier nur um das neue Creditsystem, die Daten, die demnächst folgen werden, habe ich in dem Thread bei uns hier hinterlegt. Dient lediglich zur Information, falls jemand wissen will, wieviel man bei einem Projekt abgreifen kann (sollte mal einheitlich werden).
Hängt ganz von dem Projektbetreiber und der Länge der WU ab, hätte man nur mit 1 gezählt, könnte man zumindest sehen, wieviele WUs man wirklich gerechnet hat, Benchmarkwerte im Boinc sind eh von anfang an überflüssig gewesen, man sieht, zuwas das führt, die Zahlen selbst als gesamt in den Statsseiten kann man bald nicht mehr lesen.WNj wrote: Eben - und fixed credits ist zwar einheitlich aber nun wirklich nicht fair, oder?